Monthly Spotlight

Tariffs continue to be a contentious issue, with many countries currently in a temporary pause to negotiate trade agreements. This update explores developments surrounding tariffs in May, highlighting changes in state actions and shifting perspectives among producers.

A dozen states, including Arizona, Nevada and Oregon, have filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade, arguing that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) does not grant the authority to impose tariffs. The administration contended that President Nixon’s use of tariffs in 1971 set a legal precedent that justifies their actions. Separately, California sued to overturn tariffs, claiming they cause economic harm and violate constitutional separation of powers through the Supreme Court’s major questions doctrine.

Resolutions came quicky for both cases. For the dozen states’ lawsuit, the U.S. Court of International Trade ruled that the current administration lacked the authority to impose tariffs without Congressional approval. The administration has announced plans to appeal these rulings. A district court dismissed California’s case, directing them to appeal in a specialized trade court. Legal experts believe the cases could ultimately reach the Supreme Court to resolve the question of tariff legality.

What does this mean for agricultural producers?

The outcome of these legal battles could greatly impact agricultural producers. If tariffs are deemed unlawful or their scope is limited, export markets may stabilize faster. However, uncertainty during the appeal process could pose challenges for long-term planning and increase volatility in agricultural markets.

Producers’ perspectives on tariffs are also evolving. A survey conducted by Purdue University in March and April revealed that over 56% of respondents believed tariffs would have a negative or very negative impact on their operational income. By May, this number had dropped to 43%. Additionally, a strong majority of producers, 82%, agreed or strongly agreed that free trade benefits agriculture. While challenges remain, there is growing optimism that U.S. trade will expand over the next 5 years, providing more opportunities for agricultural exports.

It’s important to note that the impact of these changes will vary by commodity, influenced by factors such as export volumes and global competition. For more specific insights into how your specific commodity might be affected, please consult the available resources on AgWest’s Industry Insight webpage.

Return to Industry Insights home page